The 2025 teachers’ strike in Kathmandu has halted Nepal’s public education, impacting 6 million students and mobilizing over 230,000 teachers demanding legislative reform. This article analyzes the strike’s origins and the teachers’ call for federal oversight, job security, and civil servant parity—challenges to Nepal’s shift toward local governance. Using recent reports and government data, it estimates NRs. 28.8 billion in losses and major risks to students’ academic futures. The review highlights the struggle to balance professional rights, constitutional mandates, and educational continuity, and offers recommendations for urgent legislative and administrative reforms to resolve the crisis and stabilize Nepal’s education sector.

The ongoing teachers’ strike in Nepal has entered its third week, creating significant disruption across the country’s educational landscape. Since April 2, 2025, thousands of teachers have been protesting in Kathmandu, demanding the immediate enactment of the School Education Act. The strike escalated on April 7 when the Nepal Teachers’ Federation (NTF) announced a nationwide educational shutdown, affecting approximately 6 million students in government schools. This movement represents one of the most significant educational protests in Nepal’s recent history, with far-reaching implications for students, families, the economy, and the country’s educational system. The strike highlights persistent tensions between teachers’ professional demands and Nepal’s governance structures in a federal system, while also revealing the economic vulnerability of a nation where general strikes have historically imposed substantial costs.

Historical context and evolution of the current crisis

The present conflict has deep roots in Nepal’s ongoing transition to federalism following the adoption of its 2015 constitution. The constitution placed school education under the jurisdiction of local governments, a move that many teachers have consistently opposed (Neupane, 2025). This structural tension forms the backdrop to the current crisis, which began taking shape in September 2023 when the government introduced a new education bill in parliament that would formalize local government control over school education (Kathmandu Post, 2025a).

Teachers immediately objected to this bill, leading to protests that resulted in a six-point agreement with the government. This agreement promised to address teachers’ concerns by revising the bill and retaining teachers under federal jurisdiction despite constitutional provisions (Kathmandu Post, 2025c). However, political disagreements among lawmakers prevented the bill’s passage, creating a legislative impasse that has now lasted over a year and a half (Economic Times, 2025).

The current phase of protests began after President Ramchandra Paudel prorogued the federal parliament session without endorsing the school education bill (Economic Times, 2025). This action prompted the Nepal Teachers’ Federation to mobilize teachers nationwide, starting with demonstrations in Kathmandu on April 2, 2025, which they characterized as the “final and decisive movement” for educational reform (myRepublica, 2025a). After five days of street protests without meaningful government response, the federation escalated to a nationwide educational strike beginning April 7, which has now continued for over two weeks (Nepal News, 2025a).

Key actors and strategic positions

The strike is led by the Nepal Teachers’ Federation (NTF), the umbrella organization representing approximately 230,000 teachers involved in school-level education throughout Nepal (Kathmandu Post, 2023). Key leadership figures orchestrating the movement include Federation President Laxmi Kishor Subedi and General Secretary Tula Bahadur Thapa, who have been the primary voices articulating teachers’ demands and coordinating protest activities (myRepublica, 2025a).

Other significant figures include Somnath Giri, president of the Nepal Teachers’ Association, who has taken a particularly hardline position, stating: “We don’t want to listen to the statements, opinions, or thoughts of the Prime Minister, political leaders, or government officials. We want the School Education Act—nothing else” (myRepublica, 2025b). This uncompromising stance has complicated negotiation efforts. Nanu Maya Parajuli, joint-chair of the federation and coordinator of the dialogue team, has adopted a more politically strategic approach, noting that “If the prime minister, Nepali Congress president, CPN (Maoist Centre) chair, and the Speaker want, the school education bill can be endorsed without further delay” (Kathmandu Post, 2025d).

On the government side, Education Minister Bidya Bhattarai has led engagement efforts, though with limited success. She reports having “personally called the chairperson of the federation for talks” and even “met the protesters during the protest,” but notes that teachers have “refused to sit for dialogue arguing there is nothing to discuss” (Kathmandu Post, 2025c). Finance Minister Bishnu Poudel has also been involved in assessing the fiscal implications of meeting teachers’ demands (Kathmandu Post, 2025d).

Private school teachers have also joined the movement, though with some hesitation about disrupting educational activities. Hom Kumar Thapa, chair of the Institutional Schools Teachers’ Union, expressed willingness to participate while seeking commitments from private schools to support their concerns (Kathmandu Post, 2023).

Local governments have positioned themselves in opposition to the teachers’ demands, with Khim Bahadur Thapa, general secretary of the National Association of the Rural Municipalities in Nepal, arguing that “the demands of the teacher’s federation are unconstitutional, and in contravention of schedule 8 of the constitution that allows the local governments to oversee the entire school education” (Kathmandu Post, 2023).

Teachers’ demands: Analysis and implications

The striking teachers have presented a comprehensive set of demands centered on the passage of the School Education Act, with specific provisions they consider non-negotiable. Their primary demand—immediate enactment of the School Education Act—functions as an umbrella for numerous specific provisions they want included in the legislation (Kathmandu Post, 2025a).

Perhaps most contentiously, teachers demand to remain under federal government jurisdiction rather than local government control as stipulated in the constitution (myRepublica, 2025b). They argue that local governments introduce excessive political interference and inconsistency in teacher management (Rising Nepal, 2025). This demand is particularly significant because it effectively requires a constitutional amendment or creative legal interpretation to implement, making it politically complex.

Additional demands focus on professional security and benefits, including:

  1. Job security, promotions, and benefits for all categories of school-level teachers, including temporary teachers and those recruited under relief quotas (Kathmandu Post, 2023)
  2. Inclusion of teachers in the order of precedence, which would formally recognize their status in official government hierarchies (Kathmandu Post, 2025c)
  3. Increasing the entry age for teachers to 40, providing more flexibility in recruitment (Kathmandu Post, 2025c)
  4. Monthly salary payments and pay/perks at par with civil servants, addressing long-standing compensation disparities (Kathmandu Post, 2025c)
  5. A dedicated hospital for teachers, similar to those provided for army, police, and civil service personnel (Kathmandu Post, 2025c)
  6. Increased salary for Early Childhood Development facilitators to Rs17,300 per month (Kathmandu Post, 2025d)
  7. Medical allowances for temporary teachers (Kathmandu Post, 2025d)
  8. Inflation allowance for school employees (Kathmandu Post, 2025d)

Through informal discussions, the government has already agreed to some of these demands, including the salary increase for Early Childhood Development facilitators, determining the order of precedence for teachers, providing inflation allowances to school employees, and medical allowances for temporary teachers (Kathmandu Post, 2025d). However, the federation maintains that all demands must be incorporated into the School Education Act, rather than addressed through administrative measures that might be reversed later.

Scale, scope, and impact of the strike

The current strike represents a massive mobilization of Nepal’s educational workforce. While exact figures vary across sources, approximately 25,000 teachers gathered in Kathmandu for protests on April 6, with numbers expected to double to 50,000 as the strike intensified (Makalu Khabar, 2025). These numbers represent a significant portion of Nepal’s estimated 230,000 school teachers (Kathmandu Post, 2023).

The strike’s impact on students is even more substantial. Approximately 6 million students at government schools have been affected by the nationwide closure (myRepublica, 2025a). Among these, 550,000 students preparing for Grade 12 examinations face particular uncertainty, as the strike threatens to disrupt these crucial exams scheduled to begin on April 24 (Spotlight Nepal, 2025).

The strike has systematically disabled Nepal’s educational infrastructure by:

  1. Forcing nationwide school closures (Nepal News, 2025a)
  2. Halting the evaluation of answer sheets for the Secondary Education Examination (SEE), delaying results (Rising Nepal, 2025)
  3. Disrupting the national enrollment campaign for the new academic session that began April 15 (Nepal News, 2025b)
  4. Preventing teacher participation in training workshops, seminars, or educational tours (myRepublica, 2025a)
  5. Threatening the boycott of upcoming Grade 12 board examinations by exam center chiefs and invigilators (Nepal News, 2025b)

Mahashram Sharma, chair of the National Examinations Board, has emphasized the importance of not taking lightly the impact on students’ futures if exams are delayed, noting that any such delay could hinder students’ admission to domestic and international universities that operate on fixed schedules (Spotlight Nepal, 2025). This is particularly significant given the growing trend of Nepali students pursuing higher education abroad after completing grade 12.

Economic impact: Calculating the costs

While specific economic analyses of the current strike are not yet available, historical data on general strikes in Nepal provides a framework for understanding the likely economic impact. Research by the Nepal Rastra Bank found that the direct economic cost of a one-day nationwide strike was approximately NRs. 1.8 billion (approximately USD 13.5 million at current exchange rates), with annual output losses due to strikes averaging NRs. 27 billion, or 1.38% of annual gross output (Shrestha & Chaudhary, 2022).

Applying these figures to the current 16-day strike suggests an estimated direct economic cost of approximately NRs. 28.8 billion (USD 216 million). This calculation likely understates the true cost, as it doesn’t account for long-term impacts on student learning, future productivity, or international educational competitiveness.

The strike’s impact extends far beyond immediate economic losses. Historical data indicates that general strikes have decelerated Nepal’s annual GDP growth rates by between 0.59 and 2.15 percentage points (Shrestha & Chaudhary, 2022). Extended educational strikes may have similar or greater impacts given their disruption of human capital development.

The strike has also created significant indirect costs for families. Parents like Sabitri Acharya report having “taken several days off work to look after her daughter,” creating lost productivity and income for households (BBC, 2023). With schools closed nationwide, this pattern is likely replicated across millions of Nepali families, compounding the economic impact.

Additionally, the strike threatens to disrupt international educational pathways for students. With data indicating a growing trend of Nepali students pursuing higher education abroad after completing grade 12, delays in examinations and results could prevent students from meeting application deadlines for international universities, resulting in deferred enrollments and lost opportunities (Spotlight Nepal, 2025).

Political dimensions and constitutional tensions

The strike highlights fundamental tensions in Nepal’s federal structure. The 2015 constitution shifted governance of public institutions including schools to local authorities, addressing concerns about the centralization of power in Kathmandu (BBC, 2023). However, teachers have resisted this change, arguing for federal oversight to ensure professional security and consistent standards.

This creates a constitutional dilemma: acceding to teachers’ demands would either require amending the constitution or implementing policies that contradict its provisions. As Khim Bahadur Thapa, general secretary of the National Association of the Rural Municipalities in Nepal, has noted, “the demands of the teacher’s federation are unconstitutional, and in contravention of schedule 8 of the constitution that allows the local governments to oversee the entire school education” (Kathmandu Post, 2023).

The political history of teachers in Nepal adds another layer of complexity. Nepali teachers were prominently involved in the country’s democracy movement, and political parties have long recruited teachers as activists (BBC, 2023). This politicization of education has led some experts to argue that “teachers’ involvement in politics undermines education quality,” creating tensions around provisions that would bar teachers from joining organizations with political affiliations (BBC, 2023).

The strike also reveals political divisions within Nepal’s ruling coalition. Despite the urgency of the situation, the School Education Bill has remained stalled due to “huge differences among the lawmakers” (Kathmandu Post, 2025c). This suggests that the educational crisis serves as a proxy for broader political conflicts about federalism, governance, and resource allocation.

Government response and negotiation efforts

The government’s response to the strike has evolved from initial calls for dialogue to more substantive engagement with teachers’ demands. Education Minister Bidya Bhattarai has taken the lead in engagement efforts, reporting that the “government has frequently called them for dialogue” (Economic Times, 2025). However, these early efforts were unsuccessful, with teachers refusing to participate in talks.

As the strike has continued, the government has begun making concrete concessions. After “informal dialogues multiple times,” the government agreed to increase the salary of Early Childhood Development facilitators to Rs17,300 a month, determine the order of precedence for teachers, provide inflation allowance to school employees, and offer medical allowances for temporary teachers (Kathmandu Post, 2025d).

Most significantly, as of April 16, 2025, “the government has agreed to summon a parliamentary session to pass the School Education Bill, in line with their demand” (Kathmandu Post, 2025d). This represents a major shift in the government’s position and potentially signals a path toward resolution.

The government’s approach appears influenced by fiscal considerations. Education Minister Bhattarai has “regularly been holding meetings with Bishnu Poudel, deputy prime minister and minister for finance” to assess “how many of the protesters’ demands the government can realistically address” since “implementation of all the demands will create pressure on state coffers” (Kathmandu Post, 2025d).

Way forward: Potential solutions and recommendations

Resolving the current crisis requires balancing teachers’ professional concerns with constitutional governance structures while prioritizing students’ educational needs. Several potential approaches emerge from analysis of the situation:

  1. Expedited legislative action: The government’s commitment to summon a parliamentary session represents the most direct path to resolution. Parliament should prioritize passing a revised School Education Bill incorporating key teacher demands while respecting constitutional provisions (Kathmandu Post, 2025d).
  2. Staged implementation: Given fiscal constraints, the government could implement demands in phases, starting with those already agreed to in informal dialogues (salary increases, order of precedence, allowances) while establishing a concrete timeline for addressing remaining issues (Kathmandu Post, 2025d).
  3. Constitutional clarification: The fundamental tension between teachers’ desire for federal oversight and constitutional provisions for local control requires resolution. Parliament could establish a special committee to propose constitutional amendments or interpretive frameworks that balance local governance with national educational standards.
  4. Prioritizing educational continuity: While negotiations continue, both sides should consider interim measures to restart educational activities, particularly for students facing critical examinations. The National Examination Board’s appeal for teachers to support Grade 12 exams provides a model for such temporary accommodations (Spotlight Nepal, 2025).
  5. Depoliticization framework: Addressing concerns about politicization of education while respecting teachers’ rights to political participation requires nuanced solutions. Legislation could distinguish between political activities during school hours versus private time, or establish professional ethics frameworks rather than outright bans.
  6. Economic impact mitigation: Given the substantial economic costs of the strike, government should develop contingency plans to mitigate impacts on students and families, potentially including extended school calendars, supplementary educational programs, or targeted support for students facing university application deadlines.

Conclusion

The ongoing teachers’ strike in Nepal represents a critical juncture for the country’s educational system, with implications extending far beyond classrooms to national governance structures, economic development, and political stability. The dispute highlights fundamental tensions in Nepal’s federal system that require thoughtful resolution rather than temporary compromises.

The economic costs of the strike – potentially exceeding NRs. 28.8 billion in direct impacts alone – underscore the urgent need for resolution. However, equally concerning are the long-term impacts on students, particularly the 550,000 preparing for Grade 12 examinations that could determine their educational and professional futures.

The government’s recent agreement to summon parliament and pass the School Education Bill offers hope for resolution. However, the constitutional complexities surrounding teacher governance suggest that sustainable solutions will require careful balancing of local autonomy, national standards, and professional security for educators.

As Nepal navigates this crisis, prioritizing educational continuity while addressing legitimate teacher concerns must remain the central focus. The future of millions of students—and by extension, Nepal’s development trajectory—depends on finding a path forward that strengthens educational quality while respecting constitutional governance structures. Only through such balanced solutions can Nepal transform this crisis into an opportunity for meaningful educational reform.

References

BBC. (2023, September 22). Nepal: Teachers strike over education reform shuts down schools. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-66886528

Economic Times. (2025, April 8). Nepal: Teachers stage nationwide strike, demand new education act. Education Times. https://education.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/nepal-teachers-stage-nationwide-strike-demand-new-education-act/120103627

Kathmandu Post. (2023, September 20). Teachers to strike nationwide, 7 million students to be hit. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/weekender/2023/09/20/teachers-to-strike-nationwide-7-million-students-to-be-hit

Kathmandu Post. (2025a, April 9). Teachers’ protest in Kathmandu enters eighth day. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2025/04/09/teachers-protest-in-kathmandu-enters-eighth-day

Kathmandu Post. (2025b, April 14). Teachers’ continued demonstrations could affect academic calendar. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2025/04/14/teachers-continued-demonstrations-could-affect-academic-calendar

Kathmandu Post. (2025c, April 7). Agitating teachers announce nationwide education strike starting today. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2025/04/07/agitating-teachers-announce-nationwide-education-strike-starting-today

Kathmandu Post. (2025d, April 16). Parliament to address teachers’ demands. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2025/04/16/parliament-to-address-teachers-demands

Makalu Khabar. (2025, April 7). Teachers strengthen nationwide protest for Federal Education Act. Makalu Khabar. https://english.makalukhabar.com/2025/04/246675/

myRepublica. (2025a, April 6). Teachers announce educational strike from April 7. myRepublica. https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/teachers-announce-educational-strike-from-april-7-72-61.html

myRepublica. (2025b, April 7). Teachers warn of nationwide strikes as govt remains indifferent to their demands. myRepublica. https://www.myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/teachers-warn-of-nationwide-strikes-as-govt-remains-indifferent-to-their-de-15-10.html

Nepal News. (2025a, April 6). Nepal Teachers’ Federation calls for indefinite academic strike. Nepal News. https://nepalnews.com/s/nation/nepal-teachers-federation-calls-for-indefinite-academic-strike/

Nepal News. (2025b, April 15). Teachers’ protest enters Day 13, to disrupts enrollment and exams. Nepal News. https://nepalnews.com/s/society/teachers-protest-enters-day-13-to-disrupts-enrollment-and-exams/

Rising Nepal. (2025, April 9). Teachers In Agitation. The Rising Nepal. https://risingnepaldaily.com/news/60061

Shrestha, M. B., & Chaudhary, S. K. (2022). The Economic Cost of General Strikes in Nepal. Nepal Rastra Bank. https://www.nrb.org.np/contents/uploads/2022/12/vol26-1_art1.pdf

Spotlight Nepal. (2025, April 17). 550000 Students’ Future At Stake Due To Teachers’ strike. Spotlight Nepal. https://www.spotlightnepal.com/2025/04/17/550000-students-future-stake-due-teachers-strike/